American College of Clinical Pharmacy
      Search      Cart
         

Mon-57 - Evaluation of a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) Capstone Research Project Experience

Scientific Poster Session III - Original Research

Original Research
  Monday, November 13, 2023
  01:00 PM–02:30 PM

Abstract

Introduction: Despite less than 25% of PharmD programs requiring research methods coursework, professional organizations continue to promote student research training. To improve PharmD students’ preparation and competency in research, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences implemented a two-year capstone research project experience (CRPE). This consists of a faculty-mentored research project either in teams of four or individually through a selective research track, two one-credit courses in research methods/education during P3 year, a six-week advanced pharmacy practice experience, and a poster presentation day.

Research Question or Hypothesis: What are PharmD students’ research perceptions and outcomes following CRPE?

Study Design: Single-center, cross-sectional survey.

Methods: An anonymous, voluntary, electronic survey was distributed via REDCap® to P4 students (n=80) at the conclusion of CRPE. The survey asked questions related to demographics, perceptions, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared test were performed using SPSS version 29.0.0.0.

Results: Fifty-seven completed the survey resulting in a response rate of 71.3%. Demographics: female (73.2%), age mean (26.3±3.02) years, prior degree (65.0%), prior research experience (28.1%), prior publication (8.8%). Post-graduation career placements: residencies (40.4%), fellowships (5.3%), community (35.1%), hospital (12.3%). Study types: retrospective cohort (49.1%), survey (19.3%), basic science (15.8%), governmental database (3.5%), other (12.3%). Nearly all students (89.5%) agreed or strongly agreed CRPE improved their overall knowledge and perceptions of research. Most (77.2%) indicated CRPE met their expectations. Most (75.5%) felt that the P3 course was directly applicable to their projects. Many (45.6%) indicated their research was presented at a national meeting, but only 8.8% indicated it was published/accepted. No statistically significant difference was identified among students with or without prior research experience who strongly agreed/agreed they were pleased with their CRPE outcomes and results (81.3% versus 75.6%, p=0.507).

Conclusion: Among surveyed P4 PharmD students, CRPE improved their research knowledge and was perceived positively overall; however, a potential area for improvement is to promote research publication.

Presenting Author

Wesley Kufel PharmD
Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Authors

Mohammad Ali PhD
Binghamton University

Sarah Spinler PharmD