American College of Clinical Pharmacy
      Search      Cart
         
  Poster Hall

Mon-54 - Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Iron Sucrose Versus Ferric Carboxymaltose

Scientific Poster Session III - Original Research

Original Research
  Monday, October 14, 2024
  01:00 PM–02:30 PM

Abstract

Introduction: Data comparing the clinical outcomes of iron sucrose versus ferric carboxymaltose is limited

Research Question or Hypothesis: is iron sucrose more effective than ferric carboxymaltose in the management of anemia?

Study Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at our quaternary care hospital between May 2015 and June 2019, included adults who received either iron sucrose or ferric carboxymaltose. For patients who received multiple iron courses, only the first encounter was analyzed. The primary outcome was the increase in hemoglobin levels. The Mann-Whitney U test compared outcomes versus baseline medians within each group, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared the change in hemoglobin levels between the two groups.

Results: A total of 643 patients were analyzed, with 311 receiving iron sucrose (group 1) and 332 receiving ferric carboxymaltose (group 2). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 1 (0-5) for group 1 and 4 (0-7) for group 2 (p<0.001). Both iron formulations significantly increased hemoglobin levels: group 1 from 93 (84-105) to 114 (99-127) g/L (p<0.001), and group 2 from 92 (81-103) to 103 (87-117) g/L (p<0.001). The change in hemoglobin was significantly greater with iron sucrose: 16.5 (5-29) compared to 6.5 (-1-21) for ferric carboxymaltose (p<0.001). Stepwise multivariate linear regression identified baseline hemoglobin [B=0.52 (0.4-0.6); p<0.001], ESA use [B=-7.4 (-11 to -3.8); p<0.001], total iron dose [B=0.01 (0.01-0.02); p<0.001], blood transfusion [B=-9.5 (-12 to -6.6); p<0.001], CCI [B=-0.6 (-1 to -0.12); p=0.013], and ferric carboxymaltose [B=-9.5 (-12 to -6.6); p<0.001] as the main predictors of hemoglobin level at the end of the study.

Conclusion: Multiple factors were shown to affect hemoglobin levels, which need to be considered when managing anemia, including the type of iron formulation used. Our findings need to be verified in larger prospective studies.

Presenting Author

Wasim Elnekidy PharmD, BCPS, BCACP
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi

Authors

Emna Abidi PhD
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi

Khaled Aldhanhani PharmD
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi

Diaa Alrahmany BSc Pharm
3- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Directorate General of Medical Supplies, Ministry of Health, Muscat 3110, Oman

Islam Ghazi PharmD
Arnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy

Jihad Mallat MD
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi

Lavinia Salama PharmD, BCACP, BC-ADM, CDCES
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Cookies

This website uses cookies to help ACCP provide you with the best user experience. If you continue to use our services, ACCP will assume that you agree to the use of such cookies. You can find out how to update your settings by referring to ACCP’s Policy on Cookies.