American College of Clinical Pharmacy
      Search      Cart
         
  Poster Hall

Sun-22 - Performance of the American Heart Association PREVENT™ Cardiovascular Risk Calculator in Older Adults

Scientific Poster Session II - Late Breaking Original Research

Late Breaking Original Research
  Sunday, October 13, 2024
  12:45 PM–02:15 PM

Abstract

Introduction: The ability of the recently released American Heart Association PREVENTTM calculator to accurately assign 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in a modern cohort of older individuals, including those > 79 years, is unknown.

Research Question or Hypothesis: Does PREVENTTM have better predictive performance than PCE for ASCVD events in a contemporary cohort of older adults?

Study Design: Post-hoc analysis of 18,297 adults from Australia and the U.S., aged =65 years, enrolled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly randomized preventive trial of aspirin, including post-trial observational follow-up to 2022.

Methods: ASCVD events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, stroke), occurring in-trial and during follow-up were adjudicated by expert panel. The discriminative ability of both risk calculators was assessed by Harell’s c-statistic following Cox regression. For calibration, predicted event numbers for PREVENTTM and PCE were calculated for 15,510 participants aged 65-79 years by multiplying 10-year predicted risk scaled for the actual length of follow-up of each participant by the total population, and compared with the number of observed events in-trial and follow-up. The analysis was repeated in 2,787 participants aged >79 years.

Results: PREVENTTM showed superior discriminative performance compared to PCE (PREVENTTM vs. PCE, c-statistic: 0.793 vs 0.740 p<0.001 in participants aged 65-79 years; 0.854 vs. 0.799, p<0.001 in those aged >79 years). Among participants aged 65-79 years, 1084 ASCVD events occurred; PCE predicted 3102 events (13.0% overestimate) while PREVENTTM predicted 1290 events (1.3% overestimate). For those >79 years, 355 ASCVD events occurred; PCE predicted 1067 events (25.5% overestimate) while PREVENTTM predicted 350 events (0.16% underestimate). PREVENT’s discrimination and calibration were superior to PCE when subgroups of sex, country, and race were examined separately.

Conclusion: PREVENTTM is superior to PCE in predicting ASCVD events in older adults from the US and Australia, including those aged >79 years.

Presenting Author

Michelle Fravel PharmD, FCCP, BCPS
University of Iowa

Authors

Michael Ernst PharmD, FCCP, BCGP
Mark Nelson PhD
Monash University

Kevan Polkinghorne PhD
Monash University

Christopher Reid PhD
Monash University

Rory Wolfe PhD
Monash University

Robyn Woods PhD
Monash University

Zhen Zhou PhD
Monash University

Cookies

This website uses cookies to help ACCP provide you with the best user experience. If you continue to use our services, ACCP will assume that you agree to the use of such cookies. You can find out how to update your settings by referring to ACCP’s Policy on Cookies.